DIY IAQ Testing: Run Simple Home Experiments Like a Tech Reviewer

Beat the heat, bills, and uncertainty: run simple, repeatable IAQ tests at home like a tech reviewer

If your living room turns into a stuffy greenhouse after dinner, your allergies spike after vacuuming, or you're unsure whether opening a window actually helps — you need data, not guesswork. This guide (written in 2026 with the latest device trends and real-world testing methods) walks homeowners through reproducible, low-cost indoor air quality (IAQ) experiments for CO2, PM2.5, and VOCs. You'll learn what to measure, how to log results like a reviewer, how to calibrate and validate inexpensive sensors, and exactly how to turn numbers into ventilation decisions.

Why run DIY IAQ tests now (2026 context)

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw two important shifts: low-cost sensor hardware matured and more jurisdictions tightened indoor air guidance. Consumer-grade NDIR CO2 modules and improved optical particulate sensors became widely available, while smart IAQ devices moved from flashy prototypes at CES to reliable, cloud-connected products. That makes DIY testing practical and meaningful for homeowners who want to reduce energy waste and improve health without replacing HVAC systems.

But new tech can create false confidence if you don't test devices like a reviewer. The techniques below are designed to be reproducible: you can repeat them, compare runs, and quantify how ventilation or an air cleaner changes your indoor air.

Quick primer: what each measurement tells you

• CO2 (ppm) — proxy for occupancy-related ventilation. High indoor CO2 usually means stale air and insufficient fresh-air exchange. Useful for determining whether to increase outdoor air or run mechanical ventilation.
• PM2.5 (µg/m3) — fine particles from cooking, smoking, wildfire smoke, candles, and some cleaning. Linked to respiratory and cardiovascular risk. Use particulate tests to size air cleaners (CADR) and identify pollution sources.
• VOCs (ppb / eTVOC) — broad class of gases from paints, cleaners, personal care products, and off-gassing. Many low-cost VOC sensors (metal-oxide) are non-specific but excellent at detecting spikes and trends.

Tools of the trade (budget-friendly options in 2026)

No lab gear required. Get one reliable unit for each parameter or a combined IAQ monitor. Typical 2026 price ranges:

• NDIR CO2 monitor: $90–$250 — choose one with CSV export or app logging.
• Optical PM2.5 sensor (PMS or OPC): $40–$150 — look for models that report PM1/PM2.5/PM10.
• eTVOC/MOS VOC monitor: $60–$200 — treat readings as relative changes unless factory-calibrated.
• Optional: USB data logger, Raspberry Pi with sensor hats, or a Wi‑Fi IAQ monitor that supports CSV export or Home Assistant integration for continuous logging.

Where to buy and what to check

• Buy from reputable sellers or brands with clear specs (NDIR for CO2, recognized optical sensors for PM).
• Prefer devices with exportable data or open integrations — reproducibility depends on access to raw readings.
• Check community reviews and recent 2025–2026 test reports; manufactures improved firmware and calibration practices during that period.

Before you run tests: setup and baseline steps

Consistency is key. A reviewer repeats conditions to isolate variables — do the same.

1. Pick a test room — note its length, width, and height (calculate volume in cubic feet or cubic meters).
2. Choose sensor locations — place sensors 3–5 feet above the floor, away from direct exhalation, windows, or HVAC outlets. Use identical placement each run.
3. Logging interval — 1–5 minutes is ideal. Too coarse misses peaks; too fine produces noisy data unless your sensor supports it.
4. Record conditions — outdoor temperature, weather (windy or still), whether windows are open, occupancy, cooking events, cleaning products used, HVAC fan setting.
5. Warm up sensors — many devices need 10–30 minutes for stable readings. For CO2 NDIR sensors, allow 10–20 minutes; for optical PM sensors, run the fan/cycling for a short time to clear dust before baseline capture.

Reproducible experiments: step-by-step

Below are three experiments a homeowner can run in a single afternoon. Repeat them on different days to build confidence.

1) CO2 occupancy & ventilation test (estimate ACH from decay)

Objective: measure how well a room exchanges air and whether window/ventilation changes reduce CO2 quickly.

1. Close windows and doors. Turn off mechanical ventilation (if you can) for a controlled build-up.
2. Start logging CO2 every 1–2 minutes. Note outdoor CO2 (walk outside with the monitor or assume ~420 ppm as a 2026 baseline; urban levels vary).
3. Ask 2–4 people to sit in the room for 20–30 minutes doing normal conversation to raise CO2. Record time and occupancy.
4. When CO2 peaks, have everyone leave and then open windows or turn on intended ventilation method. Continue logging until CO2 returns near baseline.
5. Compute ACH (air changes per hour) using the decay method: use the adjusted formula that removes outdoor CO2 influence:

   ACH = -60 * ln((C_t - C_out)/(C_0 - C_out)) / t

   where C_0 is concentration at start of decay, C_t is concentration after time t minutes, and C_out is outdoor CO2.

Example: room volume 600 ft3, C_0=1200 ppm, C_t=700 ppm after t=20 min, C_out=420 ppm. Compute k = -ln((700-420)/(1200-420))/20 ≈ -ln(280/780)/20 ≈ -ln(0.3590)/20 ≈ 1.023/20 = 0.05115 per min. ACH = 0.05115 * 60 ≈ 3.07 ACH.

Interpretation: 3 ACH is decent for a living room. If ACH <1, you need more ventilation or an air cleaner.

2) PM2.5 source test (cooking vs. air cleaner)

Objective: show particle spikes from cooking and quantify how much a portable HEPA cleaner reduces PM2.5.

1. Place PM2.5 sensor in the kitchen or adjacent living area. Start logging at 1-minute intervals and capture a 10–15 minute pre-event baseline.
2. Run a standard cooking event (frying or sautéing for 10 minutes is a common test). Record start and end times.
3. After peak, turn on your HEPA portable cleaner (record speed) and log the decay until baseline or for 60 minutes.
4. Estimate particle removal rate and compute effective CADR needed: CADR (cfm) ≈ room_volume_cuft * ACH_required / 60. To translate measured decay ACH to CADR: CADR ≈ room_volume_cuft * ACH_measured / 60.

Example: 500 ft3 room, measured ACH decay with cleaner on = 4 ACH. CADR ≈ 500 * 4 / 60 ≈ 33.3 cfm. If manufacturer's CADR is 150 cfm, cleaner is more than sufficient for that volume at that setting.

3) VOC spike and ventilation response test (cleaning product or scented candle)

Objective: detect VOC spikes from a cleaning spray or candle, and see how quickly opening a window or using exhaust clears the spike.

1. Start with baseline logging for 10–15 minutes.
2. Use a measured amount of product (e.g., two sprays from a spray bottle or light a candle for 2 minutes). Record exact time and action.
3. Monitor VOC sensor response. After the spike, open a window or run an exhaust fan and log decay. Compare strategies (window vs. fan vs. air cleaner with activated VOC/charcoal stage if available).

Note: MOS VOC sensors measure total volatile organics as eTVOC, not specific species. Use them to compare interventions and identify which actions reduce exposure fastest.

Calibration and validation: minimize sensor bias

Sensors drift and report differently. Tech reviewers use reference instruments; at home you can perform simple validation to improve trust in readings.

• CO2 NDIR baseline check: take the monitor outside for 10 minutes and confirm it's near expected outdoor CO2 (2026 urban baseline ~410–430 ppm). If it's off, many devices allow a manual calibration to outdoor baseline.
• PM2.5 cross-check: compare your PM monitor to a local government or community sensor (many cities publish hourly PM2.5). Co-locate the device outdoors for a few hours and calculate a linear correction factor if offsets are consistent.
• VOC zeroing: MOS sensors can drift and respond to humidity/temperature. Establish an indoor baseline (well-ventilated state) and treat readings relative to that baseline. For comparative experiments, focus on change magnitude and decay time rather than absolute ppb.

Logging, analysis, and reproducible documentation

Good reviewers keep a logbook. You should too — but digital.

1. Export raw CSV from devices or use Home Assistant/Node-RED to collect timestamps and values. If your device only has an app, use screenshots and manual time-stamped notes.
2. Create a spreadsheet with columns: timestamp, sensor reading (CO2/PM2.5/VOC), room condition (window open/closed), occupancy, event label (cooking, cleaning), and weather/outdoor sensor reading.
3. Plot the time series and annotate events. Look for repeatable patterns across runs — that’s the signal.
4. Save raw files and a short methods note: device model, firmware version, sensor placement, logging interval, and test date/time. That lets you or a friend replicate the run months later.

Interpreting results — thresholds and action triggers

Use these practical thresholds as a starting point. Local regulations and medical advice may differ; treat these as guidance based on 2026 common practice and public health recommendations.

• CO2
  • <800 ppm — generally indicates adequate ventilation for typical occupancy
  • 800–1,000 ppm — consider increasing ventilation (open window, boost fan)
  • >1,000 ppm — poor ventilation; take action. >1,500 ppm — sustained levels suggest serious ventilation issues.
• PM2.5
  • <12 µg/m3 — US EPA 'good' (annual guideline context). WHO's rigorous 2021 guideline set lower targets; in 2026 many homeowners aim for <15 µg/m3 24-hour.
  • 12–35 µg/m3 — moderate; source identification and portable air cleaner recommended during peaks.
  • >35 µg/m3 — high; reduce exposure immediately, close windows during wildfire episodes, and run HEPA cleaners.
• VOCs
  • No universal safe threshold for all VOCs. Use the sensor to detect spikes (e.g., a doubling of baseline) and act: increase ventilation and avoid repeated use of the product.

Advanced tip: quantify the effect of an air cleaner

Run a controlled PM2.5 test: create a short particle event (toast bread or briefly fry) and measure peak. Turn on the cleaner at a known setting and measure decay. From the decay constant compute effective ACH and convert to CADR to see if the device meets your room needs.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Placing sensors too close to sources (stove, exhalation) — gives exaggerated peaks. Use standardized placement 1–2 m from sources.
• Relying on a single run — repeat tests at different times and days for robust conclusions.
• Over-interpreting VOC numeric values — use these sensors for relative changes and actions, not to identify specific chemicals.
• Ignoring sensor drift — re-check baselines monthly and after firmware updates.

“Treat your home like a test lab: define the question, hold variables steady, run repeatable tests, and log everything.”

Real-world example (case study)

In late 2025 a renter in a 2-bedroom apartment ran the CO2 occupancy test before and after upgrading to a mechanical inline exhaust timer. Baseline test (closed windows, 3 people for 30 minutes) recorded CO2 peak = 1,300 ppm and decay ACH ≈ 0.9. With the exhaust set to continuous low and windows briefly cracked during occupancy, peak CO2 dropped to 850 ppm and measured ACH rose to 2.8. Result: occupant kept HVAC fan on low during occupancy and saw reported allergy symptoms reduce.

2026 trends to watch and what they mean for DIY testing

• Integrated IAQ ecosystems: more monitors now support open APIs and Home Assistant native integrations. This makes long-term logging and automation (e.g., auto-run fan when CO2 > 900 ppm) easier.
• Improved low-cost calibration: several manufacturers released firmware updates in late 2025 that reduce NDIR drift, and community calibration profiles grew in 2026 — benefit to buyers who value reproducible data.
• Privacy-aware cloud services: after privacy debates in 2025, many vendors now offer local-only logging modes. For reproducible tests, prefer devices that keep raw data local or exportable.

Maintenance checklist

• Monthly: check CO2 baseline outdoors, clean PM sensor inlet and replace pre-filters if applicable.
• Quarterly: verify VOC baseline in a ventilated room and note any large discrepancies.
• Annually: update firmware, re-run a standard test, and record changes in your logbook.

Bottom line: turn numbers into ventilation decisions

Run the simple experiments above, log everything, and ask three practical questions after each run:

1. Does the room reach CO2 levels that indicate inadequate ventilation during typical use?
2. Do activities like cooking create PM2.5 events that spill into living spaces?
3. Which interventions (open windows, mechanical ventilation, HEPA cleaner) produced the biggest and fastest improvement per my logged data?

Armed with this evidence, choose the least disruptive, energy-conscious action that delivers measurable benefit. For example, if a small HEPA unit achieves a 4 ACH equivalent for your bedroom and keeps PM2.5 <12 µg/m3 during cooking, it may be more cost-effective than running an HVAC system at high outside-air settings year-round.

Resources & templates

Downloadable templates (checklist, CSV log format, ACH calculation sheet) make your first round easier. Keep a versioned file and note device firmware — that’s how reviewers stay reproducible and how you can track changes over months or seasons.

Final takeaways

• Simple, repeatable IAQ tests are accessible and actionable for homeowners in 2026.
• Use NDIR CO2 for ventilation, optical PM sensors for particles, and VOC sensors for relative trends.
• Calibrate baselines, log consistently, and compute ACH/CADR to translate results into ventilation choices.
• Small tests (CO2 occupancy, cooking PM2.5, VOC spike) reveal the interventions that actually work in your home.

Ready to run your first test? Download our printable checklist and sample CSV worksheet to start logging like a pro — then come back and compare your results. Small experiments, repeated carefully, lead to big improvements in comfort, health, and energy use.

Call to action

Want guided help picking the right sensors or converting your test results into a simple ventilation plan? Visit our IAQ tools page for recommended devices, downloadable logging templates, and step‑by‑step video walk-throughs tailored to homeowners in 2026. Start testing — and take control of your indoor air.

Related Reading

• The Evolution of Home Review Labs in 2026: From Pop‑Up Tests to Micro‑Fulfilment
• Benchmarking the AI HAT+ 2: Real-World Performance for Generative Tasks on Raspberry Pi 5
• Field Test: Building a Portable Preservation Lab for On-Site Capture — A Maker's Guide
• Beyond Filing: The 2026 Playbook for Collaborative File Tagging, Edge Indexing, and Privacy‑First Sharing
• Low‑Budget Retrofits & Power Resilience for Community Makerspaces (2026)
• Ergonomic Pedal Mods: From Heel Plates to Custom Insoles for Performance Drivers
• What FedRAMP and Government-Grade AI Platforms Mean for Property Management Security
• When Cultural Memes Turn Commercial: Monetizing ‘Very Chinese Time’ Without Being Exploitative
• Tax Breaks and Risks for Sports Bettors: Reporting Winnings, Losses, and Bot Income
• DIY Tailgate Drinks: Craft Cocktail Syrups and Mocktails for Every Match